garryanderson.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the garryanderson.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host garryanderson.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is UK2 Infrastructure .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called openresty containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

.com ~ skilled.org under reconstruction think about it – the gap between the rich and poor always gets wider. the poorest hardly get any rise and are still in poverty, those of us above get little more - whilst rich fat-cats increase their incomes by up to 30%, compounded year on year into a massive annual fortune. incomes diverge, never converge to improve inequality. they think us idiots. the uk office for national statistics help the scam using statistical confidence tricks, including the gini coefficient. my findings prove this beyond any doubt. the con is to hide the ever widening income inequality between any countries powerful rich families and the rest of the population. government and authorities have utter contempt of us. if the government measured weight problems by ignoring the obese and dangerously underweight - you would say they were corrupt and trying to hide the problems - wouldn't you? that is how they measure inequality - ignore the richest and poorest groups - those millions of people most affected by what is being measured. for political motive. indeed, the uk statistics authority (deputy head of regulation) actually admitted to me about the gini, “i agree with your observation that it is not ideal if your particular interest is in inequalities at the top or bottom of the spectrum”. so admitting it is "not ideal" if you care about rich or poor. the first time perhaps they disclosed the fact they know it hides the inequalities of the rich and poor. this con goes for other inequality metrics e.g. palma ratio and s80/s20. it is sickening to me that government lied about improving inequality to make billions of pounds of welfare cuts to our poorest families. this is not simple opinion that inequality worsens, it is objective fact and is easily proven. i explain how they did it - easy enough for a school kid to understand - but not the 'experts' at the ons it seems: the gini is a con to make people believe that government are addressing inequality and are reigning it back in, when the truth is it gets worse every year. they lie, so when they show you the gini go down any year you believe that inequality does. the admission they agree with my observation is proof the authorities know it hides inequality. they know all data has to be included as it is an essential factor in making the derived analysis more accurate. yet they ignore this fact. the only logical reason to ignore the poorest and richest groups is to hide how bad inequality is getting. corrado gini would have also known this in 1912 - unless he was a terrible mathematician. this was always a con job on the general population. if government and authorities would lie about that, causing poor desperate families with children to suffer, then they would lie about anything. only fair wage legislation can stop the greed of the rich in privileged positions of power - remember that if we get any swiss-type referendum. do not bottle out. the prime minister said those words at pmq's on 24 june 2015 - https://youtu.be/ianlh5ait10?t=32m36s nb: i have had criticism about revealing the job creator myth - which plutocrat billionaire nick hanauer has recently confirmed in his video. the reality: does a factory get created with jobs as a main reason - or is hundreds of jobs gone if it can be done cheaper by machine? jobs are used only if necessity - 'job creators' do not want an expense that has wages, holidays, sickness, pensions, ni, can strike or have babies... as for the 'wealth creator' myth - guess who they create wealth for - themselves - government applaud greed and praise 'job creators' (guess why £). important - all inequality measures that i have looked at are statistical confidence tricks - it includes even the praised new palma ratio , it is much praised as it is supposed to show inequality better - being the poorest 40% compared to richest 10% of the population. scotland 'improved' since 2011/12 to 2014/15, falling from 118% to 112% with palma. good news for scottish people and government - or deception? to explain: they pretend the 40% and 10% groups are two large families – the simple comparison that the palma ratio shows. that is where professors 'go wrong'. they are, of course, millions of separate families on differing divergent incomes, divided into two large groups. if you can think for a moment about just the richest 10% group - concentrate on that. in any one year the bottom of that range will rise relatively little, whilst the richest at the top income can rise by millions. quote: ftse 100 directors enjoy 27pc pay rises [during recession] so even in that range alone, inequality has worsened . now think about the poorest 40% range of population – similar will happen there. the bottom of 40% range raises little or not at all (with poorest staying in poverty) whilst the top of the 40% range rises much more e.g. minimum wage. inequality has worsened in this range also. the outcome being that both ranges may have increased – but undeniably so has inequality - the gap between bottom and top of population most. so at the end of this you could see ‘inequality’ using the palma has improved, purely because of the bottom range total rising more – a statistical con. just because the lower range total (with increased inequality) has risen more than the upper range total (with increased inequality) - they say 'inequality' has improved. what the flip - are people really that thick? these people are intellectual professors of mathematics and economics - i mean, you understand and you think they do not? that is how the deception in similar comparison inequality measures work e.g. s80/s20. these imbeciles are effectively comparing averages of groups - whilst completely ignoring the ranges - ignoring millions of people. it was like saying that inequality in the uk improved just because the average wage went up - clearly not true. very intelligent people have been been told how to do something simple and have not understood what they are doing – which is unbelievable to me. the public are all treated as though they would never be able to understand or work this out, like imbeciles. it is most important to note - we are not taught to think for ourselves - just taught to think the same way as others - why lies continue. uk ons and other countries statistics offices measure inequality with lorenz curve and gini coefficient - it is a confidence trick fact: not only is the gini rubbish measuring inequality within a country of poor to rich, it is also useless for comparing one country to another country. the gini coefficient is a confidence trick to hide the ever widening gap between each countries powerful rich families and the rest of the population. it also clearly hides millions of poor families, many who are in poverty. obviously, nobody wants to admit they know this. using frequency distribution to hide the wealthy, it only compares the poor to average income - not comparing the millions of poorest families on lowest income to the richest. i use the analogy of measuring inequality with a rubber band in my video - inequality widens getting worse - yet the measure reads the same. close your eyes and think about it for a minute, does the gap between the rich and poor ever get narrower? wake up - they treat us like uneducated plebs! this is fact and not mere opinion being written here - some don't know the difference. an example of stretch is during 2012 the ftse director's got a 27% rise and the millions of people on minimum pay got 1.8% - the rich got £100,000's per annum, the poor got just over £200. in 2013 ceo's got 21% and those on minimum pay got 1.9% with similar sort of cash rise in the 'pay packet'. in the video i made the following chart for those bad at maths and to provide undeniable proof for corrupt people like those at the ons. how can (an ideal?) country be the same inequality as the uk? how is somebody in a country like this be living in the same inequality as us in uk? wo

URL analysis for garryanderson.co.uk

glassdoor.co.uk
news.bbc.co.uk
publications.parliament.uk
ifs.org.uk
politicsforum.co.uk
worldcitizen.uk.net
legislation.gov.uk
standard.co.uk
thecourier.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "garryanderson.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 78 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 22:51:10 20-Jul-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS garryanderson.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME garryanderson.co.uk

NSERVER

  ULTRA104.UK2.NET 77.92.66.26

  ULTRA103.UK2.NET 77.92.66.25

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .